Archive for the ‘Social Software’ Category

21st Century Skills: The Virtues of Ancient Greece

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

Last week I gave a talk in a workshop organized by the Confederation of Finnish Industries EK. The theme of the workshop was to explore the future of education in Finland. The title of my talk was “digitalization, networks and the future of education” (In Finnish: Digitalisoituminen, verkottuminen ja koulutuksen tulevaisuus).

My original plan for the talk was to bring up the latest international discussion around the 21st century skills: what they are, why they are considered to be important, and how different stakeholders are planning to achieve them?

Finally, I didn’t talk about the 21st century skills at all, but about digital culture and how the social behavior online is strongly affecting on “offline” areas of human life, such as schools and educational system. I concluded that, though we live the era of digital knowledge and networks we probably should not drive “skills sets” from these external factors, but maybe look the old good virtues of ancient Greece and think what could they mean in the 21st century. The classical four Greek virtues are Practical Wisdom (sofia), Braveness (andreia), Justice (dikaiosynē), and Sophrosyne (sōfrosynē).

In Finland – cause the relatively good results from the OECD’s PISA surveys – there isn’t any huge internal pressure for major educational reforms in basic education. Children in Finnish schools all have reading/writing proficiency, can do basic math and science and know where is Burma and who is the prime minister of Italy (and if they don’t they will check it from Wikipedia in two seconds). Having a good system, leads easily to wrong kind of self-satisfaction: why we should do anything if we are doing so well? Why fix it if it is not broken?

Systems are not that simple. When you are doing well in some areas you may have huge challenges in other areas. For instance, if someone would take a look of ICT, Internet and media education in Finnish schools the results could be quite surprising. In these areas, the educational systems ability to respond to the changing world has been very poor. We do not have laptops in schools, we do not produce or use open educational resources and our “online teachers community” is, if not non-existing, very small. Also our ability to encourage our children to be active citizens who see the world as something they can change seems to be very limiting.

If we do not continuously develop the educational system it will decay. Systems are like gardens; you must take care of them. My humble interpretation of the areas in need of more attention in the Finnish educational system are: 1) use of ICT in Education: especially social software, open content and free and open source software; 2) The virtues of ancient Greece.

I feel that for the readers of this blog there isn’t need to list what the better use of ICT in education would mean. Because of this I’ll focus on the virtues and try to explain how they could be more present in schools and education.

The Practical Wisdom (sofia) maps well with the idea of critical thinking, problem solving and design thinking skills. Practical means focusing on solving problems of the real world. Wisdom is ability to look the problem from various points of views and to come-up with creative solutions. This is happening very little in schools today. We just do not ask children to have a look of the real world problems and ask them to search solutions to them, with help of the methods of different disciplines. For instance, how many math teachers are using global warming as the context or case in her teaching? Are we still working in the silos of different school subjects? I am afraid we are. Practical wisdom develops in a balanced practice of art and science.

Braveness (andreia) requires from one-side communication skills and from another side ability to take risks. It requires a lot of braveness to speak-up one’s mind, to share once opinion and to take part in public life. To do this one needs strong communication skills, ability to read and write, talk and listen – in several languages. Risk taking means ability to stand change and unknowingness. Many people see braveness also a critical factor in entrepreneurship.

Justice (dikaiosynē) naturally means skill to see the difference between right and wrong – to be fair and honest. It also means ability to do and support things that are rather constructive than distractive.

Sophrosyne (sōfrosynē) means moderation and temperance in everything. It means avoidance of excess in daily life, in public life, in business.

So, how one can “teach the virtues”? Actually it is simple. Virtues bloom and grown when you use them. Simple – just have good teachers.

Academic Administration and Freedom

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

What a title. Reading it makes me smile.

I am nowadays dealing almost daily with academic administration of the soon starting Aalto University. I am kindly asked to comment plans of having new ICT system, how to have ICT enhancing teaching and learning, tenure track, research assessment exercise etc. All these are important and event to some extent pretty interesting stuff.

When dealing with these things, there are three proverbs I keep on repeating in my little head. These are:

1) Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water.

2) Don’t fall into the Not Invented Here syndrome (NIH).

3) Don’t be the fire chief who keeps on telling for the volunteer firefighters that their did their job, but technically wrong. (I think this is very Finnish proverb / joke and does not make much sense in English)

With the Aalto University – merger between the Helsinki School of Economics, the University of Art and Design Helsinki and the Helsinki University of Technology – one of the key preparatory activities was an extensive, international research assessment of all the units of the three Schools.

The results from my unit – Media Lab Helsinki – were in a nutshell, as follows (straight quotations from the evaluation report):

“Scientific Quality of the Unit’s Research – Numerical Rating (1‐5): 4 Very Good International Level”
“Scientific Impact of the Unit’s Research – Numerical Rating (1‐5): 4 Very Good International Level”
“Societal Impact of the Unit’s Research – Numerical Rating (1‐5): 5 Outstanding International Level”
“Research Environment at the Unit of Assessment – Numerical Rating (1‐5): 4 Very Good International Level”
“Future Potential of the Unit of Assessment – Numerical Rating (1‐5): 5 Outstanding”

You may guess that we were pretty proud about the results. Regardless of the great results from the assessment, I am seriously worried whatever these results will ever translate to any constructive actions.

I am afraid that when things will be “reorganized” we may loose the flexibility and freedom causing the good results. We will throw out the baby with the bath water.

For instance, the new tenure track system may not recognize the existing expertise in the unit and those who (1) made the great results and (2) are holding the “outstanding future potential” will have hard time to find a place. In a worst-case scenario these people will reclaim the results of the research assessment and move to some other University or research institution. I have some friends in US with this experience.

With the new ICT systems – for internal communication and to enhance teaching and learning – I am afraid of the not invented here syndrome (NIH).

For instance, when selecting intranet/extranet solutions we should be well informed, educated and strategic. This means, that we a honest with the fact that the software engineers are not necessary the best people to design communication systems, such as intranet solutions. They of course know how the bits move in there, but are not – seriously – very good with people, those poor things who will end-up using the system.

In my unit, in last 15 years, we have designed and implemented hundreds of intra/extra/social media systems. The Onni intranet system, developed in-house in cooperation with some people from the School of Design, is definitely one of the best intra/extra/social media systems in the “market” (Socialtext is pretty good, too). Why wouldn’t we use the Onni in the whole Aalto University? Because it is not made by the software engineers of the Helsinki University of Technology but some weird art and design people? I am afraid. To demonstrate that I am not myself falling it to the NIH, I am open to accept Socialtext, as the intra/extra/social media system of the new Aalto University. Please no Confluence Wiki (it’s a wiki, not an intra/extra/social media!).

Finally. The fire chief. In our unit we have many flexible practices that help us to do our job very well: to do (high quality) research and to run our MA and doctoral programs. Sometime the procedures are not exactly according to the rules and guidelines of the University. We do things in a way that may look strange for someone who is not that deep in our operation. In most of the cases there is a practical reason to do things the way we do them. Often the reason is just “common sense”, to save time, effort and nerves or to be focused and not to do things that are not necessary. The results count, right?

Summa summarum: We need autonomy and freedom – not only in the University’s relation in its funders – but also internally in the University, in the unit’s relations to the academic administration.

Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning: call for papers!

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

We organise the SIRTEL’09 workshop for the 3rd time this year! It’s about social media and learning resources in a large sense (e.g. educational resources, other learners, experts, tutors) and how they can facilitate teaching and learning tasks.

Paper Submission by June 14, 2009
The workshop takes place in the International Conference on Web-based Learning (ICWL) 2009
Aachen, Germany, August 21, 2009

Check out:

* the whole SIRTEL’09 call at: http://celstec.org/sirtel
* Background write-ups on Flosse from last years:
We use people to find content. We use content to find people and
Workshop to brainstorm an Amazon.com or a Flikr for learning purposes

RATIONALE

Learning and teaching resource are available on the Web – both in terms of digital learning content and people resources (e.g. other learners, experts, tutors). They can be used to facilitate teaching and learning tasks. The remaining challenge is to develop, deploy and evaluate Social information retrieval (SIR) methods, techniques and systems that provide learners and teachers with guidance in potentially overwhelming variety of choices.

The aim of the SIRTEL’09 workshop is to look onward beyond recent achievements to discuss specific topics, emerging research issues, new trends and endeavors in SIR for TEL. The workshop will bring together researchers and practitioners to present, and more importantly, to discuss the current status of research in SIR and TEL and its implications for science and teaching.

sirtel09

Teaching with blogs and wikis – basic tools for problem-based study projects

Sunday, February 1st, 2009

I just realized that in last five years I have not taught a single course without a blog and a wiki, except couple of courses were I have been asked (read:forced) to use the Moodle of the organization where I have been visiting.

This spring term I am teaching a course – or I actually call it study project – with the title: “New Media Concepts for WHO – Study Project Exploring New Media Concepts for WHO’s Health Action in Crises”.

For the project I set-up a Wordpress blog and a workspace in Google pages. The Google pages we are using like a private wiki. For me these tools are not just “tools”. The decision to use these tools is based on the pedagogy I am trying to implement in the study project. The pedagogy is one kind of implementation of some of the principles of project learning and problem-based learning. I call it “learning in a problem-based study project”-

Project learning principles are: (1) setting ‘the driving question’, (2) investigations, (3) products or artifacts, (4) learning communities, and (5) use of cognitive tools (Bluemenfeld et all. 1991). Through investigation in a community by using different kind of cognitive tools to work out their own artifacts students will construct their own cognitive models and learn key concepts and principles and to communicate their knowledge to others.

Problem-based learning is another pedagogical approach. It does not emphasis the project or artifact creations similar way as the project learning. However, in both of them problems, challenges, and questions are central. Also in problem-based learning the study groups are working in a small groups … well to solve the problems. The groups meet regularly and between the meetings they work independently to search for information needed to solve the problems.

Why then a blog and a wiki?

When you have done something many times, it easily happens that it becomes “tacit knowledge”. This is a well-known phenomenon in studies of expertise. Experts often know what to do, even if they are not able to explain why their practice is good.

To make tacit knowledge explicit one must do some reflection. Ask why? Yesterday I did and wrote to the blog of the study project:

Here is a short introduction to our online working and learning infrastructure.

This blog is naturally the hub of the study project. Reading the posts in the archives you can track back what has happen in the project.

In addition to the blog we have Collaboration Wiki for internal collaboration.

Simple. A blog and a wiki. I was today thinking the different roles of the blog and the wiki in the project.

The blog is definitely the place to communicate on everything – I mean on everything. Basically there shouldn’t be any topic we could not talk to each other in public – on the blog. The possible add-value of communicating everything in public is that someone that has a solution to our challenge may hear us and contact.

The wiki is not a space for communication in a common sense. It is a place to keep larger documents and files that are still under construction. This way it is a more a warehouse, workshop and garage than a meeting room (that is the blog). Actually the wiki could also be public and open for anyone to follow and even participate, but this time we decided to do it this way.

Now I know why. If you are interested in to follow how the study project is progressing, please, add the blog in your RSS-reader. There will be nice stuff.

The world’s first book about social media in education?

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

Tarmo Toikkanen, a colleague from our Learning Environments research group, just got from a press some copies of the book he co-authored with Eija Kalliala. The book is published by Finn Lectura publishing house.

With Tarmo we discussed that the book could actually be the world’s first book ever that is focusing primary on social media in education. With fast Amazon search I found out that there are number of books about social media and many other things (such as business) but not really any aiming to open what role social media plays in teaching, learning and education in general. I wonder if the book is the world’s first book about social media in education?

Tarmo told that they themselves questioned the idea of writing a traditional paper book about social media, but concluded that there is a need for a book. Majority of teachers – the main target group of the book – are still living largely in the web 1.0 world able to use email, learning management systems and simply search and browse the web. Learning about social media may simply not happen with the tools teacher do not know already. For this purpose teachers need a book.

Whatever the book is the world’s first book about social media in education, it is the first one in Finland and in Finnish. That we know.

The site of the book is here:

www.sosiaalinenmediaopetuksessa.fi

..and the blog here:

blogi.sosiaalinenmediaopetuksessa.fi

Congratulations Tarmo and Eija!